Showing posts tagged privilege

While I appreciate the It Gets Better campaign, I cannot respect Dan Savage.

villiljos:

laurenfelton:

Even his campaign is problematic if you ask me. I’m more fond of the “MAKE it better” campaign created in response to it…

I’m really out of the loop here. What has he done to earn disrespect, and what is the problem with the campaign? I’ve only seen a couple of videos, but I thought they were quite moving, and with a positive message.

I dislike him largely because of his unrepentant racism, transphobia, misogyny, and white, male, gym-body privilege — qualities that are hardly redeemed by this campaign. While there are people out there who find the videos inspiring, the ones I most appreciate are coming from those who recognize that “it” DOESN’T get better — especially not for those who lack the white, male, middle-class, gym-body privilege that “good gays” like Dan Savage have. The fact that he’s preaching to us that “it gets better,” all the while remaining defensive of his biases and oblivious to his own privilege demonstrates exactly what’s wrong with this campaign and gay rights causes in general: same-sex marriage and the repeal of DADT doesn’t mean that it’s getting better — all this means is that our community is hindered by the same problems evident in social movements throughout history: black people were left out of the women’s suffrage movement and gays were left out of the Civil Rights Movement in the same way that people of color, trans people, working class people, and others are left out of the LGBTQ movement. 

In my opinion, it doesn’t just get better. Through the tools of social action, political organizing, and community building, we have the power to make our society better, and in the process, we get better. But as long as there is racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and other forms of prejudice in the world, no member of our community is free, and “it” hasn’t gotten better. Queer liberation will not happen until we see human liberation — until we stop meeting homophobia with racism and classism, until women are no loger blamed for being sexually assaulted, until our country stops fighting these endless wars, until Palestinians have stood at their very last checkpoint, until trans people are no longer cheated by organizations HRC, until intersex infants are no longer mutilated, until queer youth stop turning up dead… this campaign doesn’t address any of that. It simply suggests that somehow, magically, it gets better all on its own, despite the fact that we continue to live in an unequal society. 

Here’s one of my favorite “it gets better” videos — from a woman of color who points out that the campaign videos are well-intentioned, but problematic: 

(Source: bi-in-alberta)

(Reblogged from villiljos)

My Moment? Whaaa…

I’m all for telling off the ~haters~ when they deserve it, but Rebecca Black’s new video about how big and famous she is such a joke. The lyrics might as well be “I’m a privileged little white girl who can get anything she wants, so all of you low-lives can suck it.”

Newsflash: You’re not better than everyone else just because people know your name. They know you’re name because you have rich parents willing to finance your joke of a music career.

I know I said something defending Rebecca Black when she was receiving death threats over Friday, and I stand by that, but she’s just as blind and pathetic as the “haters” if she thinks being a bad singer with enough privilege and wealth to make up for it is somehow groundbreaking. The music industry is already full of bourgeois fucks who are famous for being famous.

Honestly, I don’t give a shit about Rebecca having a terrible singing voice - I’m certainly no singer myself. But this song should seriously be renamed “Throwing My White Privilege in Your Face.”

(Reblogged from fuckyeahimfabulous)

Sarah Palin you are a moron, I hope Facebook deletes you…

femasculine:

So I’m thinking all our reports about Sarah Palins note ‘An Intolerable Mistake on Hallowed Ground’ being a racist hate speech worked because she reposted it about five hours ago saying the original ‘was somehow unintentionally deleted by mistake or technical glitch.’

I reported it again, and it would be cool if everybody else did too. 

The comments are what really sicken me. Comparing a mosque to a Hitler shrine at Auschwitz (or “Auswitz,” as this person seems to think it is spelled)? The very next commentator even had the audacity to suggest that we’re allowing Muslims to “conquer” the very country that fosters such an Islamophobic environment. I’m sick of the majority complaining that the minority they routinely marginalize and oppress is taking over the world. I just want to tell these people to get over their own privilege.

(Reblogged from femasculine)

The dynamic between people of color and the LGBTQ community is problematic in a lot of ways, and lately, the posts at Queerty have really been getting to me. I’m not exactly a Sherri Shepherd fan, but they rip on her constantly, and it’s not always because she’s saying something blatantly homophobic (as in this video), but partially because the white gay men who think they can speak for our entire community are completely blind to the way race plays into this debate.

In this video, I actually think she brings up some pretty relevant points. While I agree that wives of cheating men run the risk of unknowingly contracting HIV regardless of whether they’re being cheated in with men or women, that’s not necessarily relevant to the reasons why black men are living on the downlow. The fact is, queer people of color (particularly black men, in this discussion) face many obstacles that white members of our community do not, both because of racism within our community and because of anti-LGBTQ prejudices within the black community. In this video, and especially in the second half of the video, it’s clear to me that while Shepherd doesn’t always have the most progressive views in terms of LGBTQ rights, part of the problem is that Thomas Roberts — the gay, white, former CNN anchor in this video — is not willing to recognize his own white privilege. In no part of this video does Shepherd deny the fact that black women can contract HIV through drug usage or unsafe sex with straight men; she simply points out the problematic reality of men on the downlow. And she’s heavily criticized for that simplistic explanation of HIV amongst black women, though Queerty’s justification for this criticism is just as (if not more) ignorant and simplistic. Why? They seem to overlook the simple fact that SHE IS BLACK, and probably has more knowledge of the black community than white gay men do. Call her “uneducated” all you want, but she doesn’t need to know statistics in order to understand the reality of black women who have been affected by the downlow.

Don’t get me wrong. I’ve heard HIV+ black women speak in anger over the fact that their husbands cheated on them with men. I’ve even heard them say blatantly homophobic things about those men, and essentially blame the entire gay population for their disease. Those comments are in no way justified, but blaming a black woman’s “stupidity” on this “lazy explanation” isn’t, either. It also overlooks a lot of the important, relevant points made in this video with respect to the downlow. Do I agree with Sherri Shepherd’s religious, conservative, and sometimes homophobic views on various issues? Of course not. Do I think she sometimes makes ignorant claims about issues she’s not fully informed of? Absolutely. But I also think Queerty (and others) find it far too easy to push her aside as a black woman, arguing that she’s homophobic when in reality, they’re guilty of their own prejudices as well.

When trans women are told that they need to stop being assertive and strong because it is a sign of male privilege - invariably by “feminists” who, of course, encourage cis women to be assertive and strong - that’s transmisogyny.

When trans women are told that they need to stop being assertive and strong because it is a sign of male privilege - invariably by “feminists” who, of course, encourage cis women to be assertive and strong - that’s transmisogyny.

When trans women are pressured into being silent, rarely offering their opinion, and refusing leadership roles for fear of being seen as male or accused of having male privilege, that’s transmisogyny.

When trans women are told that they are politically ignorant when they object to trans men “reclaiming” a derogatory term that has been used specifically against trans women and not against trans men, that’s transmisogyny.

When “women and trans” space allows everyone on a transmale spectrum to attend unquestioned (because even if their trans status is not respected, they would still be welcomed as a woman) yet people on a transfemale spectrum are subjected to scrutiny and those who are not “trans enough” are asked to leave, that’s transmisogyny.

When those same “women and trans” spaces, or even the ones that don’t police entrance, are attended by a dozen or so trans men yet zero or only one or two trans women, that’s transmisogyny. (It obviously indicates that they don’t feel welcome, don’t trust the organizers, or weren’t outreached to.)

When queer women’s spaces have trans women inclusive policies, yet any trans women who attend are generally ignored or not included in discussions, that’s transmisogyny.

What Transmisogyny Looks Like | The Bilerico Project

(via rotundlr, ourcatastrophe, faketrain, clitorisaurusrex)

(via genderqueer)

wow this is powerful

(via whyweneedsocialjustice)

Great post. There is a lot of transmisogyny (and racism, classism, etc.) within mainstream feminist rhetoric that I find problematic. It’s always helpful to remember, even when talking about oppression, the privileges we do have. Cis-gendered privilege in particular is something we don’t talk about often enough, especially in the face of “womyn born womyn” policies.

(Reblogged from whyweneedsocialjustice)
(Reblogged from whyweneedsocialjustice)
(Reblogged from whyweneedsocialjustice)

Being a feminist in 2010 is like marchin for white power in the 1950’s

chemicalali:

Alimony,Free Entrance to the clubs before 12:00, Get fired less in a recession, radio markets to you only (Single Ladies on erry station is torture), what else u askin for ?

Equal pay, political representation, an end to our objectification in the media, an end to domestic abuse and sexual violence, to stop being patronized and exploited, to not be harassed for walking alone in the street, to not be treated like men’s playthings, to not be considered “disabled” when pregnant, to have birth control covered by insurance, to not be subjected to double standards when it comes to our sex lives, to not have people assume we got our jobs on the basis of our gender or appearance, to be treated equally in the classroom and encouraged equally in stereotypically ‘male’ subjects, to not have our abilities questioned based on what time of the month it is, to be able to assert ourselves without being called “bitches,” for men to be aware of their male privilege…

Do I need to continue?

(Reblogged from chemicalbk)

What disturbs me more than the way this white officer blatantly targeted and mishandled these women (for jaywalking!) is the fact that apparently 3 people are filming with no protests from the cop. Is he so comfortable in his own privilege that he doesn’t even doubt the fact that he’ll be able to get away with this? That no one will question him punching a black woman? A lot of people are arguing that these women are known for being violent and acted inappropriately, but watch that white officer manhandle her to the point where her clothes are almost being torn off and try to tell me he dealt with this appropriately…